Lesson 1 – Ethics
Ethics = philosophical study of morality (right vs wrong, good vs bad).
Morality = beliefs, rules, values, and judgments.
“Ethos” (Greek) = habits/character → ethics relates to behavior.
Filipino context:
Gawa = actions toward goals
Gawi = habitual actions → “kagawian” (habit/ethics)
Ethics helps:
deepen thinking
guide actions
understand “the good”
Types of judgments:
Moral (right/wrong)
Legal (law-based)
Aesthetic (beauty/art)
Prudential (self-interest)
Branches of ethics:
Metaethics → meaning of moral terms
Normative ethics → principles of right/wrong
Applied ethics → real-life issues
7-step moral reasoning:
Stop & think
Clarify goals
Determine facts
Develop options
Consider consequences
Choose
Monitor/adjust
Ethics = not just happiness, but fulfilling human duty.
“The good” is shaped by culture and society.
Who defines the good?
dominant groups
what helps people flourish
cooperation for survival
Ethics = basis for evaluating moral systems.
Encourages moving from:
“kung saan ka masaya” → to → “kung ano ang tama”
Moral statements = expressions of feelings, not facts.
“X is good” = “Hurrah for X!”
“X is bad” = “Boo on X!”
Based on Logical Positivism:
Only meaningful statements:
Empirical (testable)
Analytic (true by definition)
Moral judgments = neither → so not true/false.
Morality = emotion, not knowledge.
Moral reasoning = persuasion of feelings.
Problems:
Cannot have moral truth/knowledge
Self-refuting theory
Ignores rational discussion
Can manipulate emotions
Weakens morality
“Good” = what society approves.
Morality varies by culture (no universal truth).
Key ideas:
No objective morality
Right/wrong depends on culture
Promotes tolerance
Example: social norms/laws differ (e.g., harassment laws).
Strength:
reduces “we are right” attitude
Objections:
Forces conformity
Cannot criticize society
Majority always “right”
Ignores minority views
Makes people uncritical (e.g., racism)
Problem of multiple subgroups
Denies objective moral standards
Subjectivism:
“X is good” = “I like X”
Morality = individual feelings (not society)
Emphasizes personal freedom
Truth = relative to each person
Problems:
Anything you like becomes “good”
Confuses liking with morality
Can justify harmful actions
No guidance for responsible choices
Ideal Observer Theory (IO):
“Good” = what we would approve if:
fully informed
impartial
Combines reason + emotion
Moral development:
Be informed
Be unbiased
Problems:
“Impartiality” unclear
“Fully informed” unrealistic
May need more conditions