Difficulty: Introductory | Prerequisites: None, though a basic familiarity with gender as a social concept is helpful.
Gender studies does not only examine the experiences of women. A large and growing body of scholarship looks at how societies construct the idea of "masculinity" and how those constructions shape the lives of men, women, and everyone else. This topic sits within broader debates about patriarchy, power, and social identity. If you are coming into this cold, the core takeaway is that masculinity is not a fixed biological trait; it is a set of expectations that vary across cultures, historical periods, and individual lives. You should already be comfortable with the idea that gender is at least partly socially constructed.
Masculinity is not one thing. It is a social construct that shifts across cultures, classes, and identities. The dominant version (hegemonic masculinity) rewards traits like stoicism and dominance, but enforcing that standard harms men and women alike. Studying "men and masculinities" means examining who benefits from these norms, who is marginalised by them, and how they are changing.
Masculinity
The set of attributes, behaviours, and roles that a given society associates with being a man. These are culturally produced, not biologically fixed.
In simple terms, "masculinity" is whatever a particular culture decides counts as "manly."
Hegemonic masculinity
A concept from sociologist R.W. Connell describing the dominant, most culturally valued form of masculinity in a society at a given time. It typically privileges physical strength, emotional restraint, heterosexuality, and authority.
Think of it as the "default setting" for what a man is supposed to be, the version that sits at the top of the hierarchy and against which other masculinities are measured.
Toxic masculinity
Cultural norms associated with masculinity that produce harmful outcomes: the promotion of aggression, the suppression of emotion, and the devaluation of traits labelled "feminine."
In simple terms, it is the subset of masculine expectations that actively damage people, including the men who try to live up to them.
Multiple masculinities
The idea that there is no single way to "be a man." Different men experience and perform masculinity differently depending on race, class, sexuality, disability, nationality, and other social positions.
Think of it as the plural: masculinities, not masculinity.
Intersectionality
A framework introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw that examines how overlapping social identities (race, class, gender, sexuality, disability) combine to shape a person's experience of privilege and oppression.
In simple terms, a working-class Black man and a wealthy white man both experience "masculinity," but their versions look quite different because other parts of their identity change the picture.
Patriarchy
A social system in which men as a group hold disproportionate power in political, economic, and domestic life. Patriarchy benefits men collectively, though not all men benefit equally.
Think of it as the structural backdrop: the system these masculinity norms exist inside.
Social construct
An idea or category that exists because people collectively agree on it, not because it is an inevitable fact of nature. Masculinity is a social construct: real in its effects, but not biologically determined in its details.
In simple terms, society built it, so society can also rebuild it.
Masculinity varies across cultures, communities, and individuals.
Race, class, sexual orientation, and nationality all shape how masculinity is experienced and expressed.
Western conceptions of masculinity (competitive, individualistic, emotionally restrained) are not universal; other cultural traditions may value communal responsibility, emotional expressiveness, or spiritual roles for men.
The dominant form of masculinity in any given society, positioned as the "ideal."
Key traits of the Western hegemonic model: physical strength, stoicism, dominance, heterosexuality, emotional restraint.
Functions as a hierarchy: men who conform earn social approval; men who do not (those who are more nurturing, sensitive, or expressive) are marginalised.
Hegemonic masculinity does not describe most men's actual behaviour. It describes the standard against which all men are measured.
A narrower concept than hegemonic masculinity. "Toxic" refers specifically to the norms that produce measurable harm.
Core harmful norms: promotion of aggression, suppression of emotion, devaluation of anything coded as "feminine."
Consequences for men: higher rates of mental health difficulties, reluctance to seek help, strained relationships, risk-taking behaviour.
Consequences for society: normalisation of violence, reinforcement of gender inequality, pressure on women and non-binary people to accommodate male dominance.
There is no single "correct" masculinity. Different social contexts produce different versions.
A gay man navigates masculinity differently from a heterosexual man. A Black man faces different expectations and pressures than a white man. Class, disability, and religion add further variation.
The plural "masculinities" is a deliberate analytical choice: it signals that the field rejects a one-size-fits-all model.
Men as a group benefit from patriarchy (greater access to political, economic, and social power).
Not all men benefit equally. Working-class men, men of colour, disabled men, and queer men may experience significant disadvantage even within a patriarchal system.
Men are also harmed by rigid gender expectations: pressure to be the primary breadwinner, prohibition on vulnerability, stigma around help-seeking.
There is an active, growing cultural conversation about redefining what masculinity means.
Movements encouraging emotional openness, equal partnership in relationships, and the rejection of traditional stereotypes are gaining traction.
This is not about abolishing masculinity; it is about expanding the range of what counts as acceptable masculine behaviour.
Kimberlé Crenshaw's intersectionality framework is essential to understanding masculinities.
A man's experience of masculinity is shaped by the intersection of his gender with his race, class, sexuality, and disability.
Example: a working-class man and a wealthy man may both be expected to "provide," but the material conditions and social respect attached to that expectation differ enormously.
Mental health policy: understanding toxic masculinity helps explain why men are less likely to seek psychological support and more likely to die by suicide in many countries.
Workplace culture: hegemonic masculinity norms can shape hiring, promotion, and leadership expectations in ways that disadvantage women and non-conforming men.
Education: awareness of multiple masculinities can inform anti-bullying programmes and inclusive curricula.
"Toxic masculinity" means all masculinity is toxic. It does not. The term refers to a specific subset of norms (aggression, emotional suppression, devaluation of femininity) that cause harm. Masculinity itself is a broad, neutral category.
Hegemonic masculinity describes how most men behave. It describes the culturally dominant ideal, not everyday reality. Most men do not fully embody it; the concept is about the standard, not the average.
Studying masculinities is anti-men. The field examines how gender norms harm men as well as women. Understanding rigid expectations is a step toward relieving the pressure those expectations create.
Masculinity is purely biological. While biology plays a role in sex differences, masculinity as a social phenomenon is culturally constructed. What counts as "masculine" has changed dramatically across centuries and between societies.
⚠️ Know the distinction between hegemonic masculinity and toxic masculinity. They overlap but are not synonyms. Hegemonic = the dominant ideal in a given society. Toxic = the specific norms within that ideal that cause harm.
⚠️ Be able to name R.W. Connell as the originator of hegemonic masculinity and Kimberlé Crenshaw as the originator of intersectionality.
⚠️ Understand that patriarchy benefits men as a group but not all men equally. Expect a question requiring you to explain how class, race, or sexuality modifies a man's relationship to patriarchal privilege.
⚠️ The concept of "multiple masculinities" is central. If asked to discuss masculinity, always use the plural and explain why.
⚠️ Be prepared to give a concrete example of how intersectionality changes the experience of masculinity (e.g. working-class vs. wealthy, Black vs. white, straight vs. gay).
True or false: Hegemonic masculinity describes how the majority of men behave in everyday life.
False. It describes the dominant cultural ideal, not average behaviour.
Fill in the blank: The term "hegemonic masculinity" was coined by sociologist ________.
R.W. Connell.
True or false: "Toxic masculinity" means that masculinity itself is inherently harmful.
False. It refers to a specific subset of norms (aggression, emotional suppression) that cause harm.
Fill in the blank: The concept of ________ explains how race, class, sexuality, and other identities combine to shape a man's experience of masculinity.
Intersectionality (introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw).
True or false: All men benefit equally from patriarchal systems.
False. Factors such as class, race, sexuality, and disability mean some men are significantly disadvantaged even within patriarchy.
Q: Define hegemonic masculinity and explain how it functions as a hierarchy.
A: Hegemonic masculinity, a term from R.W. Connell, is the dominant, most culturally valued form of masculinity in a given society. It functions as a hierarchy because men who conform to its standards (strength, stoicism, dominance, heterosexuality) receive social approval and power, while men who deviate (by being emotionally expressive, nurturing, or non-heterosexual) are marginalised or subordinated.
Q: What is the difference between hegemonic masculinity and toxic masculinity?
A: Hegemonic masculinity is the broader concept: the dominant ideal of manhood in a society. Toxic masculinity is narrower, referring specifically to those norms within the hegemonic model that produce measurable harm, such as the promotion of aggression, the suppression of emotion, and the devaluation of femininity.
Q: Using the concept of intersectionality, explain how two men in the same society might experience masculinity very differently.
A: Intersectionality (Crenshaw) shows that gender does not operate in isolation. A wealthy, white, heterosexual man may experience masculinity as a source of unquestioned authority and comfort. A working-class, Black, gay man in the same society may face racism, homophobia, and economic precarity that fundamentally alter what "being a man" means for him, even though both live under the same hegemonic ideal.
Q: Why is the plural "masculinities" preferred over the singular "masculinity" in gender studies?
A: The plural signals that there is no single way to be a man. Different cultures, communities, and social positions produce different forms of masculine identity. Using the singular risks implying a universal, fixed standard, which is exactly the assumption the field seeks to challenge.
Q: In what ways can rigid masculine norms harm men themselves?
A: Rigid norms can lead to emotional suppression (difficulty seeking help, reluctance to discuss feelings), mental health difficulties (higher rates of depression, substance abuse, suicide), strained personal relationships, and risk-taking behaviour. The expectation to be the sole breadwinner can also produce chronic stress and a sense of failure when economic conditions make that role impossible.
This material connects directly to feminist theory, particularly the analysis of patriarchy and gendered power structures. If your course covers second-wave and third-wave feminism, note that masculinity studies emerged partly in response to feminist critiques of male power.
Intersectionality (Crenshaw) appears across almost every topic in gender studies; understanding it here prepares you for discussions of race and gender, queer theory, and disability studies.
The concept of social construction is foundational. If you have studied the social construction of race or sexuality, the same analytical move applies here: masculinity is real in its effects but not natural in its form.
Men and masculinities, hegemonic masculinity, toxic masculinity, multiple masculinities, R.W. Connell, Raewyn Connell, Kimberlé Crenshaw, intersectionality, patriarchy, gender roles, gender norms, social construction of gender, masculinity studies, male privilege, emotional suppression, stoicism, gender hierarchy, masculine identity, manhood, feminism and men, gender inequality, breadwinner role, male mental health, masculinity and race, masculinity and class, masculinity and sexuality, gender performativity, ENG 202, understanding men in gender studies